Found at various sources around the web earlier today.
Don't be on the red stripes. (Been there, done that; would not recommend without a robust seasonal plan.) Elsewhere no guarantees either, but hey, you place your bets & you take your chances.
Dangerous toys. Too much caffeine. Advanced degree in physics. This isn't going anywhere you want to be.
Shortwave is no panacea. It's unreliable, expensive, and very low bandwidth. Think dialup speeds. But you can't beat it for latency.You bet it can't be beat. For a straight-line path at the speed of light, 6000 miles to Europe at 186 miles per millisecond comes out to 32 ms travel time. Though fiber optic, this would be about 47% slower, so make that 47 ms. Additionally, while the fiber optic may be somewhat directly routed, it can never be exactly a straight line. Call it at best taking the square way around a block vs. the diagonal. That's another 41%, which brings us up to 66 ms, which is more than double the shortwave transmission time. Throw in delays caused by in-line amplifiers, routers, etc. and it's going to total to quite a bit more. But just going with the original numbers, is 34 ms enough to matter? Not to me, no. But yes, to some people I can imagine this would be important.